CT101 “Time Fundamentals” — feedback aggregated across self-serve (standalone) and
instructor-led (ILT) queries. Class/cohort level only.
What we can derive from self-serve (standalone) queries
- Topic demand & question volume per concept
- Where self-serve learners struggle (repeat questions + low confidence)
- Content gaps vs teaching gaps, per lesson
- Sentiment & frustration trends over days/weeks
- Deflection rate — % resolved without a human
What we can derive from ILT (in-training) queries
- Live class pulse, sentiment dip timing, recap nudges
- Deferred (“not yet covered”) topics learners want early
- Concept struggle during the session → on-the-spot recap
- Cohort-over-cohort comparison for the same module
- (+ Microsoft Teams: attendance, attention, engagement)
By lesson — demand, sentiment & gaps
self-serve vs ILT split, frustration, confidence, and the gap signal
| Lesson | Questions | Self-serve / ILT | Frustration | Avg conf | Deferred | Signal |
Top struggle concepts (whole module)
ranked by repeat questions + frustration + low confidence
Module trend over time
weekly question volume & frustration
VolumeFrustration %
Cohort comparison (longitudinal)
the same module across cohorts — spot perennially hard concepts vs one-offs
| Cohort | Queries | Frustration | Avg conf | Deflection | Concepts |
|---|
LLM grounding barometer
how well the tutor stayed grounded — and correctly refused — instead of hallucinating
Recent answers
coverage decision · grounding confidence · cited course content?
| Question | Decision | Confidence | Grounded |
|---|